Free adult chat lines no upgrades no credit cards
And please don’t try to be so forthcoming with information when the influential try to secretly influence the court system.You need to learn to fake this idea of transparency a little better, please.He simply identified them by name and listed their publicly-known occupations. If the folks felt shame for voluntarily sending those letters, they publicly shamed themselves. That public shaming, if they felt it, was self-inflicted. My guess would be this would get overturned on appeal. It’s the season of snowflakes and this recommendation reeks of a snowflake mentality.Some prominent folks tried to ask for leniency for a prominent man who had confessed to sexually molesting his own daughter for more than a decade.
Tell me again who is to blame for any shame they may have felt? Our courts are designed to operate in a public, transparent fashion.
So this mini-rant may come in a future Landmark Live episode. ****** As you’ll see inside this issue, the three-person disciplinary panel consisting of two lawyers and one lay person have recommended the lowest of discipline against Platte County Prosecutor Eric Zahnd for allegedly trying to “publicly shame” writers who sent letters in support of leniency for a confessed child molester. Some high profile members of the Dearborn community wrote letters to a judge seeking leniency for a confessed child molester who also happened to be a high profile member of the Dearborn community.
It will happen whenever the mood strikes, which means if there were a camera in front of me at this moment it would be happening right now. By doing so, they voluntarily inserted themselves into a public court proceeding.
If we gave you a homer the OCDC would be pissed off at us.
So take your triple and your participation ribbon and be happy.